欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》，
文艺理论研究

文艺理论研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 109-116.

• 西方文论与美学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

德勒兹的情动理论与生成文学

葛跃   

  1. 安徽省亳州市亳州学院中文与传媒系
  • 出版日期:2021-07-25 发布日期:2021-07-18
  • 作者简介:葛跃，文学博士，副教授，主要从事西方文论与当代文化批评研究。
  • 基金资助:
    本文是安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目“重绘马克思主义对资本主义的批判路线”[项目编号：AHSKY2016D128]的阶段性成果。

Deleuze’s Affect Theory and Becoming-Literature

Ge Yue   

  1. the Department of Chinese Literature and Media, Bozhou University
  • Online:2021-07-25 Published:2021-07-18
  • About author:Ge Yue, Ph. D., is an associate professor in the Department of Chinese Literature and Media, Bozhou University. Ge's research mainly engages Western literary theory and contemporary cultural criticism studies.
  • Supported by:
    This article is supported by Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project of Anhui Province (AHSKY2016D128).

PDF (PC)

332

摘要： 在情动理论成为诸多学科分析热点的背景下，情动理论仍有颇多争议之处。检视斯宾诺莎和德勒兹情动理论可以发现，斯宾诺莎的情动体现的是身体和心灵的被动反应；而德勒兹把情动概念去背景化，用以构建瓦解权力规训、恢复生命潜能的通路。德勒兹认为符号是权力流转的主要途径，基于情动这个观测点，他在文学场域中捕捉到众多能够有效瓦解权力的方式，创造性地提出了生成文学理论，把文学创作带入政治斗争场。

关键词: 德勒兹, 情动, 权力, 生成文学

Abstract: Despite the multi-disciplinary scholarly attention it has drawn, affect theory is subject to various contestations. An in-depth examination of Spinoza’s and Deleuze’s respective theory of affect reveals that Spinoza’s concept of affect is a reflection upon the passive reactions of the body and mind, whereas Deleuze de-contextualizes the concept of affect so as to construct an approach to breaking down the power discipline and restoring the potentials of life. Deleuze opines that symbols are the primary vehicle for power transfer. From the perspective of “affect”, he captures multiple effective ways of power disintegration in the field of literature, creatively proposes the theory of becoming-literature, and brings literary creation into the field of political struggle.

Key words: Deleuze, affect, power, becoming-literature