欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》，
文艺理论研究

文艺理论研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 30-39.

• 专题：比较文学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

重新审视“东方比较文学”

杨清；曹顺庆   

  1. 四川大学
  • 出版日期:2022-11-25 发布日期:2023-01-03
  • 作者简介:杨清，文学博士，四川大学文学与新闻学院讲师，主要从事比较文学与文艺理论研究；曹顺庆，文学博士，四川大学杰出教授，欧洲科学与艺术院院士，主要从事比较文学与东方文论研究。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社科基金重大项目“东方古代文艺理论重要范畴、话语体系研究与资料整理”［项目编号：19ZDA289］阶段性成果。

Re-thinking “Eastern Comparative Literature”

Yang Qing;Cao Shunqing   

  1. Sichuan University
  • Online:2022-11-25 Published:2023-01-03
  • About author: Yang Qing， Ph.D.， is a lecturer in the College of Literature and Journalism at Sichuan University. Yang's areas of academic specialty include comparative literature and literary theory； Cao Shunqing， Ph.D.， is a Distinguished Professor at Sichuan University and a member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts. His areas of academic specialty include comparative literature and Eastern literary theory.
  • Supported by:
    This article is supported by the Major Project of National Social Sciences Fund （19ZDA289）.

PDF (PC)

354

摘要： 学界历来对“东方比较文学”的研究范围与内涵看法不一，其研究范围明显呈现广义与狭义之分，其内涵在学科范式与研究对象之间徘徊，但宗旨始终立足东方，聚焦东方自身的文学与文化比较，以此打破国际比较文学界陷于“欧洲中心主义”的僵局。近年，国内学界积极进行跨文明东西文学与文论比较，同时掀起一股东方研究热潮，要求回到“东方”，还原“东方”。在文明互鉴视野下，“东方比较文学”对于建立一个真正具有开放性、国际性的比较文学学科，意义重大，甚至其研究范围还可有所拓展，其中一个拓展方向即为东方文艺理论比较研究。重新审视“东方比较文学”，阐释其内涵，进而思考当下比较文学研究与文艺理论研究中的“东方”问题，是本文的旨归所在。

关键词: 东方比较文学； , 欧洲中心主义； , 东方文艺理论

Abstract: Scholars have long held different views on the scope and connotation of “Eastern Comparative Literature”： regarding the former， it can be understood in both broad and narrow sense； regarding the latter， it oscillates between a disciplinary paradigm and a research object. However， at its core has always been a rootedness in the East， focusing on comparative studies within Eastern literatures and cultures， so as to deconstruct “Eurocentrism” in international comparative literature studies. In recent years， while the Chinese academia has been engaged in comparative studies of Eastern and Western literature and literary theory， scholars have also embarked on Eastern studies， appealing to a return to and restoration of the East. “Eastern Comparative Literature” is of great significance to the establishment of a truly open and internationalized discipline of comparative literature studies. Its research scope can indeed be expanded， and one of the directions can be the comparative study of Eastern literary theories. This article is a rethinking of “Eastern Comparative Literature.” It elaborates on the connotation of this discipline， and discusses the question of the “East” that has been involved in current comparative literature and literary theory studies.

Key words: Eastern comparative literature； , Eurocentrism； , Eastern literary theory