欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 62-69.

• 专题:近代文学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

徐复观对“文以载道”的现代疏通

秦维   

  1. 扬州大学文学院

  • 出版日期:2022-08-25 发布日期:2022-08-26
  • 作者简介:秦维,扬州大学文学院文艺学专业在读博士,主要从事中国文艺美学研究。

Xu Fuguan’s Modern Interpretation of “Writings Are for Conveying Truth”

Qin Wei   

  1. College of Humanities at Yangzhou University

  • Online:2022-08-25 Published:2022-08-26
  • About author:Qin Wei is a Ph. D. candidate in the College of Humanities at Yangzhou University. His research interest focuses on Chinese literary aesthetics.

摘要:

近代以来,对中国文学产生过深远影响的文论话语“文以载道”遭遇了被广泛批判的命运。徐复观以新儒家学者特定的文化立场,对此问题进行了反思,并对这一命题现代价值的开掘进行了有益探索。以“心性说”为基础,徐复观潜在地将“文以载道”转换成“文以载心”,为其在古今、中西两个向度上打开了一条通路。“以通求变”成为他疏释“文以载道”的基本态度和基本方法。在还原“文以载道”历史面貌的同时,通过与“为人生而艺术”“为艺术而艺术”的对话与沟通,徐复观用传统话语消纳了环绕新文学史的两大理念,赋予“文以载道”参与现代文学批评的权限,对我们今天汲取古典资源以建设中国文论具有重要的启发意义。

关键词:

文以载道, 心性说, 为人生而艺术, 为艺术而艺术

Abstract:

Since the modern times, the discourse of “writings are for conveying truth,” notwithstanding its profound influence on the history of Chinese literature, has been widely criticized. Xu Fuguan reflected on this issue from the cultural standpoint of a Neo-Confucian scholar and explored the modern value of this proposition. Based on the theory of “nature of mind,” he potentially transformed the doctrine of “writings are for conveying truth” into that of “writings are for conveying the mind,” which established connections between the ancient and the modern as well as between Chinese and Western scholarship. “Seeking change through the universal” became his fundamental attitude towards and interpretation of “writings are for conveying truth.” On the one hand, Xu delineated the historical image of “writings are for conveying truth.” On the other, he conversed with such ideas as “art for life’s sake” and “art for art’s sake.” In other words, Xu Fuguan engaged with the two dominant concepts of modern literature through the lens of traditional thoughts. He enabled the proposition of “writings are for conveying truth” to be involved in the modern literary criticism, which remains significant for us today as we learn from the classical resources of Chinese literary theory.

Key words:

writings are for conveying truth, theory of “nature of mind”, art for life’s sake; art for art’s sake