欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》，
文艺理论研究

文艺理论研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 105-115.

• 现当代文论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

史述齐白石“衰年变法”的两条路径

夏中义
  

  1. 浙江越秀外国语学院
  • 出版日期:2021-01-25 发布日期:2021-01-31
  • 作者简介:夏中义，浙江越秀外国语学院教授、上海交通大学人文学院教授，主要从事中国现当代思想史案研究。

A Comparison of the Two Historical Narrative Approaches to Qi Baishi’s “Late-Life Transformation”

Xia Zhongyi   

  1. Zhejiang Yuexiu University of Foreign Languages
  • Online:2021-01-25 Published:2021-01-31
  • About author:Xia Zhongyi is a professor at Zhejiang Yuexiu University of Foreign Languages and Shanghai Jiaotong University. His main research interest is the study of modern and contemporary intellectual history in China.

PDF (PC)

52

摘要： 围绕齐白石“衰年变法”的两条史述路径，宜被简称为“苏式”与“非苏式”：前者的特点是“以论带史”“以论代史”；后者的特点是“以史鉴论”“论从史出”。遵循“论从史出”，须极珍视《白石老人自传》，因其对“衰年变法”的质朴概述作为“史”很靠谱，作为论也甚精湛渊默，进而可辨苏式“以论带史”之荒嬉。同理，遵循“以史鉴论”，更可警示苏式“以论代史”对“衰年变法”史实的深度扭曲，已在艺术史论界绵延近七十年。

关键词: 史学叙述, 齐白石, 衰年变法, 两条路径

Abstract: The two historical narrative approaches to Qi Baishi’s “late-life transformation” could be referred to as “the Soviet perspective” and “the non-Soviet perspective”. The former is characterized by “framing history with theory” and “substituting history with theory”, while the latter “confirming theory with historical facts” and “constructing theory with historical facts”. Following the thread “constructing theory with historical facts”, one must valorize The Autobiography of Qi Baishi, because its simple summary of “late-life transformation” is reliable as “history”, and as theory it is also superbly profound, which can shed light on the absurdity of the Soviet perspective “framing history with theory”. Likewise, by following the principle of “confirming theory with historical facts”, one can even alert the academia to the fact that the Soviet perspective “substituting history with theory” has deeply distorted the understanding of "late-life transformation” in art history theory for nearly 70 years.

Key words: historical narrative, Qi Baishi, "late-life transformation", two approaches