欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究

• 古代文论与古代文学的理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

南朝士人群体“幼属文”现象的流行与文论中“才主学辅”观念的确立

徐俪成   

  1. 华东师范大学中国语言文学系
  • 出版日期:2019-01-25 发布日期:2019-04-29
  • 作者简介:徐俪成,文学博士,华东师范大学中国语言文学系讲师,主要从事中国中古文学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    本文为中央高校基本科研业务费项目华东师范大学引进人才启动费项目“汉魏六朝士人群体文人化进程研究”[项目编号:2017ECNU-HLYT034]以及中央高校基本科研业务费项目华东师范大学人文社会科学青年跨学科创新团队项目“多元视域下的江南文化研究”[项目编号:2018ECNU-QKT008]的阶段成果。

The Trend of Early Writing Training and the Establishment of the Priority of Talent in Literary Creativity during the Southern Dynasties

Xu Licheng   

  1. the Department of Chinese Language and Literature, East China Normal University.
  • Online:2019-01-25 Published:2019-04-29
  • About author:Xu Licheng, Ph. D., a lecturer at the Department of Chinese Language and Literature, East China Normal University. His research focuses on ancient Chinese literature, especially literature of Medieval China.
  • Supported by:
    Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2017ECNU-HLYT034); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2018ECNU-QKT008) 

摘要: 南朝士族子弟间兴起的“幼属文”之风,源于汉末以后“以名取士”的社会风气。晋宋之后,文章成为士人攫取名声,提高入仕资源的手段。在惧怕年命不永、以早达为高的社会风气下,南朝后期士族子弟出仕时间的普遍提前,“幼属文”现象也逐渐向低幼化发展,甚至将学习属文提到了学习《五经》和史传之前。在这种风气的影响下,社会中大量出现以“幼属文”成名的早熟作者,社会舆论也更倾向于用“天才”解释文才的来源。这些舆论深刻影响了刘勰、钟嵘等齐梁间主要文学评论家,使他们在论及文学才能时更倾向于使用“才主学辅”的解释结构,将天才视为结撰文章的主要能力。这种观念深深影响了此后中国文论中对天才的崇奉。

关键词: 幼属文, 早仕, 文才, 才学关系

Abstract: The Trend of early writing training among aristocrats during the Southern Dynasties is derived from the concept of "selecting officials by reputation" since the late Eastern Han Dynasty. After the Jin Dynasty, the demonstration of literary skills had become one of the main methods of gaining reputation, and aristocrats thus had to get adequate training in writing skills since their childhood. Because of the fear of early death, aristocrats in the Southern Dynasties inclined to start their political career at very early age, so they could promptly rise to the positions high enough to enhance their family interests. To get a good start in political career, descendants of aristocrats had to advance the beginning of literary training, even before the studying of Confucian and historical classics. As a result, more and more teenagers showed their talent in literature before getting abundant knowledge, and literary theorists like Liu Xie and Zhong Rong started to attribute the defining factor of literary ability to talent rather than learning. This opinion had been succeeded by later generations of literati and scholars, constructing the fashion of talent worship in ancient Chinese literary criticism.

Key words: early writing training, early involvement in politics, literary talent, talent-learning relationship