欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 154-160.

• 西方文论与美学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

理论的节制:重审德里达与塞尔之争

冯庆   

  1. 中国人民大学文学院
  • 出版日期:2014-09-25 发布日期:2014-10-09
  • 作者简介:冯庆,中国人民大学文学院博士生,文艺学专业,主要从事文艺理论、中西方古典诗学和思想史方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金项目“语言转向视野下的文学理论问题重估研究”(11BZW002)的阶段性成果。

Restraining in Theory: A Review of the Debate between Derrida and Searle

Feng Qing   

  1. School of Liberal Arts, Renmin University of China (Beijing 100872, China)
  • Online:2014-09-25 Published:2014-10-09
  • About author:Feng Qing is a Ph.D. student at School of Liberal Arts, Renmin University of China (Beijing 100872, China) with research interests in literary theory, classical poetics and intellectual history.

摘要: 德里达与塞尔之间曾经发生过一场有名的论争。在这场论争中德里达以其伦理-政治观念先行的作风“解构”了奥斯汀和塞尔的言语行为理论,而塞尔则指责德里达故弄玄虚,缺少基本的英美语言哲学常识。这场论争体现了解构主义的伦理政治意图,相比之下,塞尔的学理起点值得文学理论家重视。

关键词: 言语行为, 塞尔, 德里达, 解构, 语言哲学

Abstract: The paper tries to reflect on the debate between Jacques Derrida and John R. Searle, in which Derrida tried to deconstruct Searle's speech-act theory with his usual style of approaching other theories with his preconceived ethical-political view. Searle, on the other hand, reproaches Derrida for his purposeful obscuration in his act of deconstruction and his ignorance of Anglo-American philosophy of language. The debate revealed the political intention of deconstructive criticism, but it has also brought Searle's linguistic theory to the attention of literary theorists.

Key words: speech act, John R. Searle, Jacques Derrida, deconstruction, philosophy of language