Literary Debates and Paradigm Shifts in Overseas Studies of Modern Chinese Literature

Abstract

Abstract: By way of reviewing paradigm shifts as manifested in three literary debates, this paper contends that overseas studies of modern Chinese literature never contain only one single voice but rather follow a trajectory similar to institutional changes and paradigm shifts in the humanities in Euro-America. As theories come and go inside and outside China, Chinese experiences have been pluralized and complicated by today’s fast development of globalization and therefore demand an exploration from multiple and even mobile perspectives.

Key words: modern Chinese literature, paradigm shift, institutional change, literary value, critical theory, Chinese experience, geocultural politics

Yingjin Zhang. Literary Debates and Paradigm Shifts in Overseas Studies of Modern Chinese Literature[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2013, 33(1): 28-38.

References

Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
Burger, Peter. Theory of the Avant-Garde. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
Chow, Rey, ed. Modern Chinese Literary and Cultural Studies in the Age of Theory: Reimagining a Field. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000.
---. Writing Diaspora: Tactics of Intervention in Contemporary Cultural Studies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993.
Duke, Michael S.. “Thoughts on Politics and Critical Paradigms in Modern Chinese Literature Studies.” Modern China 19.1 (1993): 41-70.
Hohendahl, Peter Uwe. Building a National Literature: The Case of Germany, 1830-1870. Trans. Renate Baron Franciscono. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989.
Hsia, C. T.. “On the ‘Scientific’ Study of Modern Chinese Literature: A Reply to Professor Pr?šek.” T’oung Pao 50.4-5 (1963): 428-74.
---. A History of Modern Chinese Fiction (Third Edition). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999.
---. The Classic Chinese Novel: A Critical Introduction. New York: Columbia University Press, 1968.
季进：《李欧梵季进对话录》。苏州：苏州大学出版社，2003年。
[Ji, Jin. Conversations between Leo Ou-fan Lee and Ji Jin. Suzhou: Suzhou University Press, 2003.]
——：《另一种声音：海外汉学访谈录》。上海：复旦大学出版社，2011年。
[----. Another Voice: Interviews with Overseas Sinologists. Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 2011.]
Lee, Leo Ou-fan. The Romantic Generation of Modern Chinese Writers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973.
---, ed. Lu Xun and His Legacy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.
---. Voices from the Iron House: A Study of Lu Xun. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.
李凤亮：《彼岸的现代性：美国华人批评家访谈录》。桂林：广西师范大学出版社，2011年。
[Li, Fengliang. Modernity on the Other Shore: Interviews with Ethnic Chinese Scholars in the United States. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press, 2011.]
Lindenberger, Herbert. The History in Literature: On Value, Genre, Institutions. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.
Link, Perry. “Ideology and Theory in the Study of Modern Chinese Literature.” Modern China 19.1 (1993): 4-12.
Liu, Kang. “Politics, Critical Paradigms: Reflections on Modern Chinese Literature Studies.” Modern China 19.1 (1993): 13-40.
刘康：“理论与现实：中国新马克思主义文化思潮的嬗变”，《今天》 2（1993）：185-95。
[Liu, Kang. “Theory and Reality: Changes in Chinese Neo-Marxist Cultural Thought.” Today 2 (1993): 185-95.]
——：“中国现代文学研究在西方的转型——兼答林培瑞、杜迈可、张隆溪教授”，《二十一世纪》19 （1993）：119-27。
[---. “Transformation of Modern Chinese Literature Studies in the West: A Response to Professors Perry Link, Michael Duke, and Zhang Longxi.” Twenty-First Century 19 (1993): 119-27.]
——：“批评理论与中国当代文化思潮”，《二十一世纪》 22（1994）：143-49。
[---. “Critical Theory and Contemporary Chinese Cultural Thought.” Twenty-First Century 22 (1994): 143-49.]
Lu, Sheldon Hsiao-peng. Chinese Modernity and Global Biopolitics: Studies in Literature and Visual Culture. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2007.
---. “Review of Shu-mei Shih, Visuality and Identity.” Modern Chinese Literature and Culture (Jan. 2008), http://mclc.osu.edu/rc/pubs/reviews/lu.htm.
---. “Notes on Four Major Paradigms in Chinese-Language Film Studies.” Journal of Chinese Cinemas 6.1 (2012): 15-25.
Pr?šek, Jaroslav. The Lyrical and the Epic: Studies of Modern Chinese Literature. Ed. Leo Ou-fan Lee. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1980.
---. “Basic Problems of the History of Modern Chinese Literature and C. T. Hsia, A History of Modern Chinese Fiction.” T’oung Pao 49.4-5 (1961): 357-404.
Shih, Shu-mei. Visuality and Identity: Sinophone Articulations Across the Pacific. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.
---. “The Concept of the Sinophone.” PMLA 126.3 (2011): 709-718.
---. “Foreword: The Sinophone as History and the Sinophone as Theory.” Journal of Chinese Cinemas 6.1 (2012): 5-7.
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein. Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.
Tsu, Jing. “Epilogue: Sinophone Writings and the Chinese Diaspora.” The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature. Vol. 2. Eds. Kang-I Sun Chang and Stephen Owen. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 706-714.
Tsu, Jing, and David Der-wei Wang, eds. Global Chinese Literature: Critical Essays. Boston: Brill, 2010.
Wang, David Der-wei. Fictional Realism in Twentieth-Century China: Mao Dun, Lao She, Shen Congwen. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.
王德威：《现代抒情传统四论》。台北：台湾大学出版中心，2011年。
[Wang, David Der-wei. Four Essays on the Modern Lyrical Tradition. Taipei: Taiwan University Publishing Center, 2011.]
夏志清：《中国现代小说史》，刘绍铭、李欧梵等合译。香港：友联出版社，1979。
[Hsia, C. T.. A History of Chinese Modern Fiction. Trans. Joseph Lau, and Leo Ou-fan Lee, et al. Hong Kong: Union Press.]
---. “讲评：张爱玲与鲁迅及其他”，《再读张爱玲》，刘绍铭、梁秉均、许子东编。济南：山东画报出版社，2004年。 61-65页。
[Hsia, C. T.. “Commentary: Eileen Chang, Lu Xun, etc.” Reading Eileen Chang Again. Eds. Joseph Lau, P. K. Leung, and Xu Zidong. Ji’nan: Shandong Pictorial Press, 2004. 61-65.]
Zhang, Longxi. “Western Theory and Chinese Reality.” Critical Inquiry 19 (1992): 105-30.
---. “Out of the Cultural Ghetto: Theory, Politics, and the Study of Chinese Literature.” Modern China 19.1 (1993): 71-101.
张隆溪：“再论政治、理论与中国文学研究——答刘康”，《二十一世纪》 20 （1993）：138-43。
[Zhang, Longxi. “Revisiting Politics, Theory, and Chinese Literary Study: A Response to Liu Kang.” Twenty-First Century 20 (1993): 138-43.]
Zhang, Yingjin. “Re-envisioning the Institution of Chinese Literary Studies: Strategies of Positionality and Self-Reflexivity.” Positions 1.3 (1993): 816-32.
——. “Review of Shu-mei Shih, Visuality and Identity: Sinophone Articulations across the Pacific.” Journal of Asian Studies 68.1 (2009): 280-82.
张英进：《审视中国：从学科史的角度观察中国电影与文学研究》。南京：南京大学出版社，2006年。
[Zhang, Yingjin. China in Focus: Studies of Chinese Cinema and Literature in the Perspective of Academic History. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2006.]
——：“鲁迅……张爱玲：中国现代文学研究的流变”，《作家》 7（2009）： 2-9。
[---. “Lu Xun … Eileen Chang: Changes in Modern Chinese Literature Studies.” Writer 7 (2009): 2-9.]
——：“历史整体性的消失与重构：中西方文学史的编撰与现当代中国文学”，《文艺争鸣》 1（2010）: 66-78。
[---. “Historical Totality Vanished and Reconstructed: Chinese and Western Literary Historiography and Modern Chinese Literature.” Literary Contention 1 (2010): 66-78.]
——：“全球化与中国电影的空间”，《文艺研究》 7（2010）： 85-93。
[---. “Globalization and Space in Chinese Cinema.” Literature and Arts Studies 7 (2010): 85-93.]
——：“游戏于历史之外：第三空间的理论与金庸小说的意义”，朱寿桐编《金庸与汉语新文学》。澳门：澳门大学出版中心，2011年。73-87页。
[---. “Play Outside History: Theory of Third Space and the Significance of Jin Yong’s Fiction.” Jin Yong and New Literature in Chinese Ed. Zhu Shoutong. Macau: University of Macau Publishing Center, 2011. 73-87.]
——：《多元中国：电影与文化论文集》。南京：南京大学出版社，2012年。
[---. Polycentric China: Essays in Cinema and Culture. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2012.]
——：“民族、国家与跨地性：反思中国电影研究中的理论架构”，《南京师范大学文学院学报》 5（2012）：1-9。
[---. “Ethnicity, Nation, and Polylocality: Reflections on Theory in Chinese Film Studies.” Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture, Nanjing Normal University 5 (2012): 1-9.]
——：“从反文典到后文典时期的超文典：作为文本和神话的张爱玲”，《当代作家评论》 6（2012）：37-49。
[---. “From Counter-canon to Hypercanon in a Post-canonical Age: Eileen Chang as Text and Myth.” Contemporary Chinese Writer 6 (2012): 37-49.]
郑树森：“夏公与‘张学’”，《再读张爱玲》，刘绍铭、梁秉均、许子东编。济南：山东画报出版社，2004年。3-6。
[Tay, William. “Sir Hsia and ‘Eileen Chang Studies’.” Reading Eileen Chang Again. Eds. Joseph Lau, P. K. Leung, and Xu Zidong. Ji’nan: Shandong Pictorial Press, 2004. 3-6.]

[1]	Chen Houliang. Why Is Being Interdisciplinary so Hard to Do for Stanley Fish？ A Critical Review with Regard to the Interdisciplinarity and Antidisciplinarity of Theory [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2023, 43(1): 79-87.
[2]	Hei Bai. Chen Xun‘s Explanation of the Structure of Wu Wenying’s Ci-poetry and Its Significance in the History of Ci-poetry [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2022, 42(6): 174-183.
[3]	Li Yongdong. Urban Imagination and the Idea of the Nation-State in Modern Chinese Literature [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2021, 41(2): 54-67.
[4]	Wang Yaochong. "Aesthetic Dignity of Words": Aestheticism in Theodor W. Adorno's Early Theory on the Philosophy of Language [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2020, 40(2): 185-195.
[5]	Richard Wolin. Habermas and Hermeneutics: From Verstehen to Lebenswelt [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2019, 39(2): 145-155.
[6]	Zhao Yong, Samuel Weber. Personal Experience About Frankfurt School: From "Non-Identity" to "Singularity" — An Interview with Professor Samuel Weber [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2017, 37(4): 40-47.
[7]	Simon C. Estok. Ecocriticism and Shakespeare, until 2016 [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2017, 37(1): 105-124.
[8]	Feng Qing. Constructivism and Its Discontents?: the Philosophical Origin of "Science Wars" [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2016, 36(5): 164-170.
[9]	Yingjin Zhang. English Scholarship on Modern Chinese Literature in the Past Fifty Years [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2016, 36(4): 39-60.
[10]	Xia Wei . On the Connotations of Hsia Chih-tsing's Criticism with an Example from the Perspective of Close Reading of A History of Modern Chinese Fiction [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2015, 35(5): 36-50.
[11]	Yingjin Zhang. Yan Lianke and Chinese Literature in the Perspective of World Literature [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2015, 35(4): 57-64.
[12]	Yao Wenfang. The Paradigm Shift of Literary Theory and Its Discourse Renovation [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2014, 34(5): 161-170.
[13]	Zhang Bi. The Application of Referent in Western Marxist Critical Theory and Its Significance [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2014, 34(4): 204-210.
[14]	Dai Dengyun. On the Paradigm Shift in Literary Theory Research [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2013, 33(2): 121-133.
[15]	Ji Jin. Dialectics between Politics and Literature: on Overseas Studies in Chinese Literature [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2013, 33(1): 39-45.