Welcome to Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art,

Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 182-186.

• Aesthetics and Culture Studies • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Aesthetic Regime of Art and the Construction of Its Politics: on Jacques Rancière's Aesthetic Thoughts

Zheng Haiting   

  1. the institute of Literature, Fujian Academy of Social Sciences (Fuzhou 350025, China)
  • Online:2017-05-25 Published:2018-01-24
  • About author:Zheng Haiting, Ph.D., is an assistant researcher in the institute of Literature, Fujian Academy of Social Sciences (Fuzhou 350025, China), with main academic interests in the study of Western contemporary literary theory.

Abstract: Jacques Rancière is not satisfied with the two modes of modernism, namely turning art into mere life or into pure art. He endeavors to reveal the hidden tension between this binary opposition, maintaining that art should play freely within this binary tension space and make the tension space a dissensus theatre of the part of no part. The essential of aesthetic revolution of modernism lies in recognizing and receiving the previous excluded parts of literature, such as details drifted away from the integrated story, characters detached from the writer's arrangement, which challenge the given distribution of the sensible with its solid existences. The politics of literature thus occurs.

Key words: Jacques Rancière, aesthetic regime, disagreement, distribution of the sensible, the politics of literature