Allison,Henry E..Kant's Theory of Taste:A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001. Bosanquet,Bernard.A History of Aesthetic.London:George Allen&Unwin Ltd,1949. Burke,Edmund.A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful.Ed.Adam Phillips.Oxford:Oxford University Press,1990. Bullough,Edward.Aesthetics:Lectures and Essays.Connecticut:Greenwood Press,1977. Ginsborg,Hannah."Aesthetic Judging and the Intentionality of Pleasure."Inquiry 46(April,2003):173-86. Guyer,Paul."Thomson's Problems with Kant:A Comment on'Kant's Problems with Ugliness.'"The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 50.4(Fall,1992):317-19. ——.Values of Beauty:Historical Essays in Aesthetics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005. Gracyk,Theodore A.,"Sublimity,Ugliness,and Formlessness in Kant's Aesthetic Theory."Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 44(Autumn,1986):49-56.[英]大卫·休谟:《人性论》(下),关文运译。北京:商务印书馆,1997年。[Hume,David.A Treatise of Human Nature.Trans.Guan Wenyun.Beijing:The Commercial Press,1997.] Kant,Immanuel.Theoretical Philosophy,1755-1770.Trans and Eds.David Walford and Ralf Meerbote.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1992.[德]康德:《判断力批判》,邓晓芒译,杨祖陶校。北京:人民出版社,2002年。[Kant,Immanuel.Critique of Judgment.Trans.Deng Xiaomang.Beijing:Chinese People's Publishing House,2002.] McConnell,Sean."How Kant Might Explain Ugliness?"British Journal of Aesthetics 48.2(April,2008):205-28. Ovid.Metamorphoses.Trans.Frank Justus Miller.Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1921. Shier,David."Why Kant Finds Nothing Ugly?"British Journal of Aesthetics 38.4(October,1998):412-18. Thomson,Garrett."Kant's problems with Ugliness."The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 50.2(Spring,1992):107-15. Wenzel,Christian."Kant Finds Nothing Ugly?"British Journal of Aesthetics 39.4(October,1999):416-22. (1)通常,人们会说“丑的艺术”,但这个词容易引起误解,让人认为艺术是丑的,而艺术、特别是我们说的“优美艺术”只能是美的。黑格尔曾说:“这些演讲研究的是美学。它们的主题是无边的美之王国,更准确点说,它们的领域是艺术,或恰当地说是美的艺术。”G.W.F.Hegel.Aesthetics;Lectures on Fine Art,Vol I.Trans.T.M.Knox(Oxford:Oxford University Press,1975)1.反之也就是说,“美的艺术”的目标是“美之王国”,就此而言“丑的艺术”显然是个矛盾的说法:艺术要么是美的(包括“关于美的艺术”和“关于丑的艺术”),要么不成其为艺术(失败的艺术/技术,丑陋的作品),但不存在丑陋的艺术。 (2)本文所引《判断力批判》皆出自此书,部分译文参照保罗·盖耶尔(Paul Guyer)、埃里克·马修斯(Eric Matthews)的英译本(Cambridge,2000)略有改动。 |