Literary Theory: Nationality in an Age of Globalization

Abstract

Abstract: The maintenance of nationality of Chinese literary theory in an age of globalization is part of the issue of the relationship between culture and nationality. Many factors are herein involved, including nationality and the globalization of Chinese literary theory, the relationship between the discourse of modernity and traditional culture, and the treatment of Localization, the modern constructive transformation of ancient Chinese literary theory, etc. A thorough study of these factors is needed to draw a reasonable conclusion. There is an important principle for introducing into China Western literary theories: the significance of the theory is to represent and interpret China's experience and its meaning rather than tailoring China's experience as insignificant footnotes to Western theories. China's Experience is an unalterable key word and a commanding point in the theoretical field.

Key words: literary theory, nationality, globalization, localization, China's experience

Nan Fan. Literary Theory: Nationality in an Age of Globalization[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2017, 37(3): 6-16.

[1]	Wang Ning. Raymond Williams' Significance to Current Literary and Cultural Studies [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2022, 42(6): 20-29.
[2]	Yang Qing, Cao Shunqing. Re-thinking “Eastern Comparative Literature” [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2022, 42(6): 30-39.
[3]	Chen Dandan. From World Literature to World Literary Theory： An Attempt to Approach Cross-cultural Aesthetics [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2022, 42(6): 40-48.
[4]	Zhou Qixing. From Cultural Studies to Literary Studies: The Evolution, Turn, and Problems of Diaspora Theory [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2022, 42(5): 91-102.
[5]	Wang Hongyue. Metamodernism: Thoughts on Literary Theory “after Postmodernism” [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2022, 42(4): 162-171.
[6]	Wang Xiaoping. On the Methodological Problem of the Discussions of “Chinese Identity” in the Exploration of “Cultural Politics” [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2022, 42(2): 14-23.
[7]	Han Wei. The Interplay between Traditional Literary Theory and Marxist Literary Criticism in the Past Hundred Years [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2021, 41(6): 1-12.
[8]	Duan Jifang. How the Althusserian Critics Inherit and Develop Marx’s Thought of Artistic Production [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2021, 41(5): 48-57.
[9]	Lin Weixuan. “Poetic Wisdom” or “Poetic Knowledge”: On the Interlingual Transformation of “Della Sapienza Poetica” [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2021, 41(2): 78-89.
[10]	Lai Daren. The Progressive Logic of Contemporary Literary Theory and Its Theoretical Reflection [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2020, 40(6): 1-9.
[11]	Jiang Shuzhuo. Xu Zhongyu's Contributions to the Study of Ancient Chinese Literary Theory [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2020, 40(5): 1-17.
[12]	Yang Dongxiao. On the Theory of Literary "Craftsmanship" during the Six Dynasties [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2020, 40(3): 46-55.
[13]	Lu Yaming. Humanistic Discourse and Knowledge Production of Literary Theory in the Early Years of the New Era [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2019, 39(5): 63-71.
[14]	Han Shangrong. Cunning Apparatus and the Pain of Modern Literature: A Parallactic Reading of Kojin Karatani's Literary Theory [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2019, 39(5): 83-91.
[15]	Li Jianzhong. Reinterpreting the Concept of Human in the Pre-Qin Classics of Literary Theory [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2019, 39(3): 134-.

Literary Theory: Nationality in an Age of Globalization

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments