欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 146-155.

• 专题:文艺理论中的新实用主义与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

论戴维森实用主义文论的三副面孔

张巧   

  1. 华南师范大学
  • 出版日期:2022-04-25 发布日期:2022-05-06
  • 作者简介:张巧,文学博士,华南师范大学审美文化与批判理论研究中心、华南师范大学文学院讲师,主要从事文艺理论与美学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社科基金青年项目“戴维森与当代文论的分析哲学向度研究”[项目号:18YJC751065]

The Three Faces of Donald Davidson’s Pragmatic Literary Theory

Zhang Qiao   

  1. South China Normal University
  • Online:2022-04-25 Published:2022-05-06
  • About author:Zhang Qiao, Ph.D., is a lecturer at the Research Center for Aesthetic Culture and Critical Theory and the School of Chinese Language and Literature, South China Normal University. Her research interests include literary theory and aesthetics.
  • Supported by:
    the Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Project (18YJC751065)

摘要: 实用主义的戴维森主要通过新实用主义者阐发而来。然而,戴维森在文论中的实用主义面向更为复杂,主要呈现为三副面孔:新实用主义者戴维森、意图主义者戴维森和彻底诠释者戴维森。戴维森的不规则语言论成为新实用主义者的语言哲学基础,以此辩护文学语言等非惯常语言在语言交流中的原初地位。但是,戴维森本人的意图主义和新实用主义的多元诠释论发生张力,前者指责后者违背了戴维森一直坚持的反约定原则,由此主张以“第一意图”来充实戴维森文论的实用主义面向。为调和上述两种路径,我们在兼顾他前后期意义理论的基础上,发展出一种新的实用主义的隐喻论。它实质是基于彻底诠释立场发展出的修辞理论,是将隐喻放在戴维森文本内部实用主义化的成果,由此更好地实现了文本忠实和实用主义立场之间的平衡。

关键词: 戴维森, 实用主义, 语言, 意义, 彻底诠释

Abstract:

Donald Davidson is mainly interpreted as a pragmatist by the neo-pragmatists. However, Davidson’s pragmatism is more complex regarding its application in literary theory, which presents him through three faces: the neo-pragmatist Davidson, the intentionalist Davidson, and the radical interpreter Davidson. Davidson’s theory of irregular language becomes the basis of the neo-pragmatists’ philosophy of language as a defense of the original status of unfamiliar languages, such as literary language, in linguistic communication. However, there is a conflict between Davidson’s intentionalism and the pluralist hermeneutic of neo-pragmatists. The former accuses the latter of violating Davidson’s long-held anti-conventionalism principle and pleads for a “first intention” to enrich the pragmatic orientation of Davidson’s literary theory. In order to reconcile the two different viewpoints, we develop a new pragmatic theory of metaphor based on his previous and later theories of meaning. It is a rhetorical theory based on a radical interpretive stance per se that results from pragmatizing the metaphor within Davidson’s text, better achieving a balance between textual fidelity and pragmatic stance.

Key words:

Donald Davidson, pragmaticism, language, meaning, radical interpretation