欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 171-180.

• 专题:文本与文体研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

子学谱系中的“说部”建构

吴文庆   

  1. 内江师范学院文学院

  • 出版日期:2022-09-25 发布日期:2022-09-25
  • 作者简介:吴文庆,文学博士,内江师范学院文学院讲师,主要从事明代文学和四库学研究。
  • 基金资助:

    本文系国家社科基金青年项目“《四库全书总目》明人说部提要考辨与明代小说史重写”[项目编号:21CZW025]的阶段性成果。

The Construction of Shuobu in the Genealogy of Zixue

Wu Wenqing   

  1. School of Chinese Language and Literature, Neijiang Normal University

  • Online:2022-09-25 Published:2022-09-25
  • About author:Wu Wenqing, Ph.D., is a lecturer in the School of Chinese Language and Literature, Neijiang Normal University. His research interest is the literature of the Ming dynasty.
  • Supported by:

    This article is supported by the Youth Project of National Social Sciences Fund (21CZW025).

摘要:

“说部”是明清时期常见的目录学术语,文献内容主要归属于子部说、杂二家,与史部杂传乃至集部杂文也不无交叠。在目录学归类和辨体层面,“说部”“子杂”“杂书”“杂著”“杂部”“小说”等门目关联,勾勒出“说部”在传统学术语境下的基本轮廓,包含子学发展的潜在空间。然而,因近代以来学术转型、文学学科兴起,造成“小说”文学化,“说部”轮廓被逐渐地弱化乃至遮蔽。以书目分类与辨体为切口,还原“说部”理论边界的变动性,发现客观存在的辨体不自洽,揭示其于子学谱系中多元博杂的属性特征和传统文体秩序中的边缘位置,有助于厘清新旧学术语境下“说部”概念的错位。在目录学的基础上完成子学谱系的“说部”建构,将传统说部和说部传统引回小说研究。

关键词:

“说部”是明清时期常见的目录学术语, 文献内容主要归属于子部说、杂二家, 与史部杂传乃至集部杂文也不无交叠。在目录学归类和辨体层面, “说部”“子杂”“杂书”“杂著”“杂部”“小说”等门目关联, 勾勒出“说部”在传统学术语境下的基本轮廓, 包含子学发展的潜在空间。然而, 因近代以来学术转型、文学学科兴起, 造成“小说”文学化, “说部”轮廓被逐渐地弱化乃至遮蔽。以书目分类与辨体为切口, 还原“说部”理论边界的变动性, 发现客观存在的辨体不自洽, 揭示其于子学谱系中多元博杂的属性特征和传统文体秩序中的边缘位置, 有助于厘清新旧学术语境下“说部”概念的错位。在目录学的基础上完成子学谱系的“说部”建构, 将传统说部和说部传统引回小说研究。

Abstract: In Yuan Zhen’s reform of imperial proclamation writing, content is given priority over form. The content covered two parts of the instructions to officials on the responsibilities and obligations and the descriptions of merits and demerits of officials, both belonging to the institutional attributes of imperial proclamation. When Yuan Zhen sought the support of imperial power for his reform, his reform was then subjected to the operation of the institutional power. As a result, his reform of linguistic style in the proclamation drafting was doomed to be incomplete. However, his efforts to introduce a less archaic style into the imperial writing gradually took on and was emulated. Yuan Zhen was critical to the imperial proclamation in the early Tang dynasty, but did not flatly reject it. Instead, he absorbed some elements that conformed to his idea. His imperial proclamation writing was modeled after the ancient Book of Documents, but he did not reproduce it. Yuan Zhen’s intention was to reform the stereotyped diction of imperial proclamation and to implement his literary idea of fact-seeking in order to realize the institutional function of imperial proclamation to promote and discredit. Different from other reforms that attempted to influence politics through literature, Yuan Zhen’ reform of imperial proclamation writing was a top-down endeavor, which represented a new change in literary reform. 

Key words:

genealogy of zixue, shuobu, the category of fiction, the category of miscellanies, stylistic discrimination